|
|
|
|
|
Book
Info:
Japanese Only: The Otaru Hot Springs Case and Racial
Discrimination in Japan
By Debito Arudou
Akashi Shoten Inc.; ISBN: 4-7503-2005-6; October 2004;
pp. 432
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book
Info:
My Darling is a Foreigner
By Saori Oguri
Media Factory; ISBN: 4840106835; December 2002; pp. 159
|
|
- Who
is the Weakest Link?
- Debito
Arudou
- Gregory
Clark
- Saori
Oguri
- Tony
Laszlo
- Ana
Bortz
-
|
The Dave Show: Original Text
By: Yuki Allyson Honjo
First,
a disclosure: I know Arudou personally and have sympathy for his
lawsuit. I firmly believe that Japan has little excuse to allow
businesses to openly reject patrons based on race. I have very little
time for apologists such as former Tama University President
Gregory Clark: he implies that discrimination is a justifiable defense
to preserve Japanese culture. “True, discrimination against foreigners
can be unpleasant,” Clark argues. “. . .But as often as not, that
is because they do not want to obey Japan’s rules and customs” (Arudou,
p. 95). Nor do I give much credence to the idea that it is “un-Japanese”
to sue: the lack of Japanese lawsuits is more a reflection of inefficiencies
in the Japanese document-based court system rather than some amorphous
and undefined notions of “culture.” Given my contact with Arudou,
I think his commitment to this lawsuit is genuine and sincere. It
should also be noted that JapanReview.Net co-editor, Paul
J. Scalise, had vetted a draft manuscript and is included in the
acknowledgements. I have—to the best of my abilities—tried
to set aside my personal biases and empathies in this review: if
I failed, it is solely my responsibility.
Arudou gained domestic and international fame through his protests
against anti-foreign sentiments in the port city of Otaru, in northern
Japan. In Sept 10, 1999, Arudou came across an anonymous e-mail
post to the Issho Kikaku Mailing list by a South American
woman married to a Japanese (Arudou, pp. 14-5). The multinational
family was ejected by a hot spring in the Otaru area for being “foreign.”
In reaction, Arudou and his colleagues created an informal group
to test this assertion. Arudou, who is Caucasian and a long-term
resident of Japan, was ejected from a hot spring bath house (onsen),
Yunohana Onsen. A movement was born.
The
onsen owners, who had had problems with inebriated and
rowdy Russian sailors, asked Arudou, his Japanese family, and his
non-Asian looking cohorts to leave. The businesses had posted signs
stating that bath facilities were for "Japanese Only" (see photo
Arudou, pp. 31, 39, 113). The onsen owners argued that
it was discriminatory to reject only Russians, so they turned away
all foreigners. Later, one onsen voluntarily lifted its
ban. Arudou, in reaction to Yunohana onsen's continued
discrimination, sued the business for damages and the city for violation
against the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All
Forms of Racial Discrimination (UN CERD).
Arudou
and his co-plaintiffs (Olaf Karthaus and Ken Sutherland), together
with the head of Issho Kikaku, “dapper and intelligent, European-born
[Tony] Laszlo,” worked on the BENCI (Businesses Excluding Non-Japanese
Customers Issho) Project. Issho Kikaku, according to its website,
is a Tokyo based NGO “that aims to monitor issues related to human
diversity, language, culture and coexistence worldwide, and strives
to facilitate a greater recognition and understanding of these issues,
both in the East Asian region and worldwide.” It was a sensible
alliance: Ana Bortz, a Brazilian journalist and Issho Kikaku member,
won one of the first lawsuits in Japan that ruled the refusal of
service based on nationality was illegal based on the UN Convention
on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination.
Later,
Arudou became a naturalized Japanese citizen and changed his name
from David Aldwinckle to Debito Arudou. When he returned to the
onsen wielding his new citizenship, he was again rejected
based on his “foreign” race.
Disagreements
with Laszlo later erupt: he becomes the villain of the piece. Arudou
and his partners then win the initial case against the onsen,
but not against the city. Arudou, who once enjoyed a wide base of
support, eventually finds himself alone, abandoned by his lawyer
and co-plaintiffs, begging an anonymous government clerk to help
him file his appeal against Otaru in Japanese. (Arudou, p. 365).
It
all seems like gripping material for a book and, indeed, could (and
should) be. However, Japanese Only never works—and on several
operating levels, at that.
Top
©
Copyright 2002-2010 JapanReview.Net, All rights reserved